home | r.b. | gallery | bio | contact | good by

The painter set

1) It was an impulse buy…. A sudden urge to capture a moment.
2) By a businessman
3) For himself, to place on the wall above his home office.
4) To paint a sunset he saw.
5) He realised sunsets cannot be captured. They have to be experienced in the moment. He had an epiphany.
Varsha Nair
ooooo

Dear collegue.
You pose a problem to me in the traditional way, conveniently exposing the statement to, later, formulate the appropriate questions.
The number of questions is 5.
To do this, I require 5 days, each response having 1 day of dedication; which places us on the day of delivery of the response on the date of Saturday, July 15.
Until then, remaining at your entire disposal.

************

1) There may be two possibilities, the first 1.a) for himself, the second 1.b) for another. In the case of “1.a” it could be from a creative impulse, a desire to invent and do. In the case of “1.b” it could be to give as a gift, to show affection by encouraging another person to invent and paint.
2) There could be two possibilities: 2.a) rooted, 2.b) uprooted. In the case of “2.a” it could be a native, born in the place. In the case of “2.b” it could be a foreigner. In this case there would be subdivisions: 2.b.1 short-stay foreigner, tourist or passing through; 2.b.2 immigrant foreigner, with the intention of settling down. A third level, 2.b.3, could be developed regarding social class.
3) This question is developed if it is affirmative in 1.b.
4) The motif or design created will be a consequence of 2.b.3. It is possible to consider two polarized possibilities: 4.1 poor class and 4.2 bourgeois class. In the case of 4.1 it could be a portrait, or a still life with food, bread, wheat, fresh vegetables. In the case of 4.2 it could be a landscape, a car, etc.
5) Possibly due to lack of will, both to give away (1.b) and to create for oneself (1.a), in short, due to a volitional issue. However, this has led to the development of a relational project of questions and answers about the found object.
Doctor prof. Álvaro Terrones

ooooo
1) On a morning when the buyer decided that something had to change and the first step was to start painting again after having had a strange dream of moons in daylight.
2) By someone who had spent too much time pursuing the wrong objectives
3) For him/herself
4) The moon in daylight
5) Because, as the buyer was reaching home with the material, he/she looked up at the light blue sky and saw a beautiful full moon in daylight and realized that it was impossible to render with simple acrylic paint on a canvas and decided to write a novel about it instead.
Myriam
ooooo
1) The equipment was not bought. There was no occasion. There was no intention.
2) An human being with kleptomania and hoarding tendencies.
3) For no one. Possibly for themselves.
4) It would have been a figurative painting - in the style of Van Gogh's 'Starry Night' - showing the moment in which the equipment was obtained.
5) The person realized what they had done to obtain the equipment. After this they could not stay with the contradiction of creating out of theft. They went into a fugue. It was during this that the item was brought to the place where it was abandoned. There was no determination in this.
ooooo
Thanks to all current and future the participants

gallery